Written by Christopher Matthews.
A recently surfaced memo allegedly linked to the World Economic Forum (WEF) has ignited controversy and fear, suggesting that former U.S. President Donald J. Trump is on a “hit list” of leaders targeted for assassination. This stark revelation comes amid Trump’s resurgence in popularity despite numerous legal challenges and ongoing political opposition. The memo, which was quickly deleted after its leak, purportedly outlines a dire scenario where global elites consider extreme measures to prevent Trump from influencing future political outcomes.
The details of the memo paint a chilling picture of desperation among certain globalist factions, who are failing to control Trump through traditional legal and political strategies, known colloquially as “lawfare.” This failure has allegedly pushed them toward considering more drastic actions to ensure he does not secure a position of power again. According to the memo, the plan to remove Trump is deemed necessary to block a repeat of his previous term, which was marked by policies and decisions that often went against the grain of established global agendas.
This information supposedly came to light when Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, known for his anti-WEF stance, narrowly survived an assassination attempt, which the memo links to his opposition to globalist policies. The mainstream media’s response, or lack thereof, to these claims further complicates the narrative, with accusations that significant news outlets are dismissing the seriousness of the situation due to potential biases and conflicts of interest.
Historical Context and Parallels
The alleged assassination plot against Trump is not without precedent in recent history. The assassination of former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in 2022, who was also known for his critical views on the globalist agenda, draws a disturbing parallel. Abe’s assassination by an individual with extremist political motives was a shock to the world and has raised concerns about the safety of other global figures who challenge the status quo.
Moreover, the memo suggests a pattern of targeting leaders who oppose the so-called New World Order, a concept frequently discussed in terms of global governance and often criticized by populist and nationalist figures. Leaders like Fico and Abe, who have positioned themselves against globalist initiatives such as the WHO Pandemic Treaty, appear to be at higher risk, according to the document. This treaty, in particular, has been a focal point of contention, seen by some as an overreach into national sovereignty by global organizations.
The discussion extends into the realm of media influence and manipulation, with the memo accusing mainstream media entities of being complicit in a broader agenda driven by global elites like Bill Gates and WHO director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. This accusation points to a deeply entrenched network of power that uses media as a tool to shape public perception and suppress dissent.
Our Take
The allegations within the leaked WEF memo, if true, represent a grave threat to the foundational principles of democracy and national sovereignty. The idea that a group of global elites could contemplate the assassination of a former U.S. president—or any political leader—due to their inability to control him is profoundly disturbing and should be cause for universal condemnation.
Such actions undermine the democratic process and pose a direct challenge to the principle that leadership should be determined by the electorate, not by unelected global power players. The potential involvement of highly influential organizations and individuals in such plots could have far-reaching implications for how global politics are conducted and perceived.
It is imperative that these claims are investigated thoroughly and transparently to ensure that any threats or illegal actions are addressed decisively. The public must demand accountability and clarity from their leaders and from global institutions that wield significant influence over world affairs. Only through vigilant oversight and a commitment to truth can we hope to protect our democratic institutions and leaders from such unacceptable threats.
This situation also serves as a critical reminder of the need for a robust and independent press that can investigate and challenge power without fear or favor. As the narrative unfolds, it is the responsibility of every citizen to stay informed, question the status quo, and advocate for a world where political disagreements are settled through discourse and elections, not violence or covert actions.
