Actress Bette Midler sparked controversy with a social media post suggesting President Joe Biden should use his newfound immunity to arrest and execute House Republicans, specifically targeting Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan. This provocative statement comes in the wake of a recent Supreme Court decision granting immunity to former President Donald Trump for his actions while in office.

Midler’s post, which linked to an article by Sidney Blumenthal in the New Republic, painted a hypothetical scenario where Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and several House Republicans are arrested, with Jordan meeting a tragic end while resisting arrest. The article fantasized about a dramatic shift in House dynamics following these extreme measures.

Outrage and Criticism

The suggestion of such extreme actions against political opponents drew swift criticism from various quarters. Midler’s call for Biden to wield his authority in this manner reflects a growing frustration among some left-leaning figures with the current political landscape. The perceived lack of accountability for Trump’s actions has intensified calls for drastic measures, although many view such proposals as crossing ethical and legal boundaries.

In response to the backlash, Midler’s supporters argue that her post was meant to highlight the frustrations felt by those who believe Trump has evaded justice. However, critics point out the dangerous implications of advocating for political violence and the erosion of democratic norms.

The Role of Public Discourse

The controversy surrounding Midler’s remarks underscores the volatile nature of contemporary political discourse. As public figures engage in increasingly heated rhetoric, calls for civility and respect for democratic processes often clash with calls for radical action. The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of responsible communication and the potential consequences of inflammatory statements in a polarized society.

Our Take

Bette Midler’s suggestion of using extreme measures against political opponents is deeply concerning and sets a dangerous precedent. Advocating for arrests and executions of elected officials based on political differences undermines the principles of democracy and the rule of law. Such rhetoric fuels division and hostility, making it harder to bridge the political divide and find common ground. It is crucial for public figures to promote civil discourse and respect for democratic institutions, rather than endorsing actions that threaten the stability and integrity of our democratic system.