Trump Set to Sue DOJ for $100 Million, Claims “Political Persecution”

Written by Matthew James.

Former President Donald Trump is preparing to sue the Department of Justice for $100 million over its 2022 raid on his Mar-a-Lago estate. Trump argues that the DOJ’s actions were not just legally questionable but were carried out with the clear intent of politically persecuting him. This bold move underscores Trump’s claim that the raid was far from standard procedure and instead served as an example of governmental overreach.

This week, Trump’s legal team confirmed the upcoming lawsuit, emphasizing that this is not just about Trump’s personal grievances. According to Trump’s attorney, Daniel Epstein, “What President Trump is doing here is not just standing up for himself—he is standing up for all Americans who believe in the rule of law and believe that you should hold the government accountable when it wrongs you.”

In their court filing, Trump’s attorneys argued that the DOJ engaged in “tortious acts” against Trump, which included “intrusion upon seclusion, malicious prosecution, and abuse of process.” These accusations stem directly from the August 8, 2022, raid on Trump’s Palm Beach residence, which his legal team describes as a blatant violation of established legal protocols.

DOJ Raid Deemed “Inconsistent” with Legal Norms

Trump’s legal team argues that the DOJ’s raid was conducted without following necessary protocols. Specifically, they assert that the raid should have required Trump’s consent, prior disclosure to his attorneys, and involvement of the local U.S. Attorney’s Office. The lawyers’ claim is that these oversights were not merely procedural missteps but deliberate actions intended to target Trump unfairly.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was part of a larger DOJ investigation into Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents. This investigation ultimately led to multiple charges being brought against Trump by special counsel Jack Smith. However, the entire case took a turn when U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed it, ruling that Smith had been unlawfully appointed as special counsel.

Trump’s legal team seized on this dismissal, arguing that the DOJ’s conduct throughout the case, from the raid on Mar-a-Lago to Smith’s appointment, demonstrated a clear intent to politically persecute the former president. They contend that the government’s actions were more about undermining Trump’s political standing than about seeking justice.

Trump’s Legal Costs and the Pursuit of Damages

In their lawsuit, Trump’s attorneys argue that the DOJ’s actions have not only tarnished Trump’s reputation but have also caused him significant financial harm. According to the legal filing, Trump has incurred approximately $15 million in actual damages, largely due to the extensive legal costs he has faced in defending himself against the DOJ’s charges. Trump’s team further argues that these costs are a direct result of the DOJ’s “malicious prosecution and abuse of process.”

Given these damages, Trump’s legal team is seeking $100 million in punitive damages. They argue that such a sum is necessary to hold the DOJ accountable for its actions and to serve as a deterrent against future political persecution. “For these harms to President Trump, the respondents must pay punitive damages of $100 million,” the filing reads, leaving little doubt about the seriousness with which Trump and his legal team are pursuing this case.

Our Take

Trump’s decision to sue the DOJ for $100 million is a bold and calculated move, one that raises important questions about the role of government in pursuing investigations against political figures. Whether one agrees with Trump’s politics or not, the idea that a government agency could be used to target a political opponent should concern all Americans. If these allegations of political persecution hold any merit, they suggest a dangerous precedent where government power can be weaponized against those who dare to challenge the status quo.

In an era where trust in institutions is already at a low point, the DOJ’s actions—if proven to be politically motivated—could further erode public confidence in the justice system. This case also highlights the growing divide in American politics, where legal battles are increasingly seen as extensions of political conflicts. It’s a troubling trend that should give everyone pause.

Trump’s lawsuit, regardless of its outcome, serves as a reminder that the principles of justice and fairness must be upheld, even when it involves controversial figures. After all, if government power can be misused against a former president, what’s to stop it from being misused against ordinary citizens?

Trending Stories:

Our Sponsors:

politicaldepot.com/.com