Written by Nathaniel Clarke.
A former Big Pharma executive has claimed that the latest round of COVID-19 vaccines contains potent sterilization chemicals, with the aim of rendering up to 70% of the recipients infertile. According to this insider, this is not just an accident, but a deliberate move.
In a recent interview, Sir John Bell, a key player in the creation of the University of Oxford’s COVID vaccine, mentioned that the newest jab from the university could sterilize between 60% and 70% of those vaccinated. Bell, a professor of medicine at Oxford, seemed to hint that the true objective of these vaccines goes beyond fighting COVID—it might be about reducing the global population.
“These vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilize a population,” Bell remarked with what could only be described as frustration. “But they’re very likely to affect around 60 to 70 percent.” He further added that regulatory bodies would need to examine the vaccine thoroughly before it was rolled out, suggesting a degree of caution—but also confirming the troubling potential.
The Ongoing Clinical Trials
The vaccine is still undergoing clinical trials, with results pending. Sir John acknowledged that there would be a gap between the completion of these trials and the regulatory approval process, hinting that they were proceeding with caution—or maybe just buying time.
Interestingly, Sir John’s comments were abruptly cut off during the interview, raising eyebrows. The interviewer seemed eager to prevent further details from slipping out, leading to speculation that something more sinister is at play regarding the vaccine’s ingredients and intended effects.
Critics on social media have seized on Sir John’s statements, pointing out that his use of the word “sterilize” might refer to preventing virus transmission rather than sterilizing humans. But given the lack of evidence that these vaccines stop the spread of COVID, many remain skeptical.
One online commenter highlighted a medical definition of “sterilizing immunity,” noting that it refers to a vaccine that eradicates a virus before it can replicate in the host. The COVID vaccines, however, have not shown evidence of this capability.
Vaccine Efficacy Questioned
Dr. Peter McCullough, MD, MPH, has also weighed in, criticizing the global vaccination campaign initiated under Operation Warp Speed. According to McCullough, the vaccines have had little to no positive impact on the pandemic.
Instead, McCullough outlined three developments that significantly reduced the severity of COVID:
- Early treatment with multidrug protocols.
- Natural immunity from prior COVID strains.
- The mutation of the virus into less harmful variants like Omicron.
Similarly, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, MD, echoed McCullough’s concerns, stating that the vaccines present more risks than benefits. She emphasized that, given the available data, the shots should have been withdrawn from the market long ago, describing the situation as one where profit is placed above public safety.
Our Take
The idea that a vaccine intended to curb a pandemic could contain chemicals aimed at sterilizing large portions of the population is both alarming and dystopian. If true, it raises serious ethical concerns about the role of pharmaceutical companies and governments in public health. The fact that these claims are being made by a high-profile medical professional should not be taken lightly.
While the mainstream media and public health officials dismiss these concerns, the public has every right to demand more transparency and accountability. After all, it’s not just about fighting a virus—it’s about preserving human dignity and ensuring that no one is subjected to such extreme measures without full awareness and consent.
