Written by John Anderson.
The Senate Intelligence Committee has voted to advance Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination for Director of National Intelligence (DNI). The 9-8 vote fell strictly along party lines, showing just how divided Washington remains. With two Republican senators—Susan Collins of Maine and Todd Young of Indiana—holding out until the last moment, Gabbard’s approval was never a sure thing.
Now, her fate rests with the full Senate.
Why Gabbard’s Nomination Is Causing a Stir
Gabbard has never been one to shy away from controversy. Her political career has been filled with moments that challenge both parties, making her one of the most unpredictable figures in recent years.
Some lawmakers are concerned about past remarks she has made regarding U.S. intelligence agencies, as well as her foreign policy positions. Others see her as a much-needed shake-up in the intelligence community, bringing a different perspective to a role traditionally held by Washington insiders.
The Syria Trip That Still Raises Eyebrows
Back in 2017, Gabbard took a trip to Syria and met with President Bashar al-Assad. Critics say this move legitimized a dictator accused of war crimes, while Gabbard argues she was seeking diplomacy and a deeper understanding of the situation on the ground.
For many, this meeting is a key reason to doubt her judgment. Foreign policy hawks view it as a reckless move that went against U.S. interests, while her supporters believe it was a bold effort to pursue peace.
Her Stance on Edward Snowden
Another major concern for lawmakers has been her stance on Edward Snowden, the former NSA contractor who leaked classified information about government surveillance programs. Gabbard has expressed support for stronger protections for whistleblowers but has also made it clear she won’t seek a pardon for Snowden—a stance that helped her secure votes from skeptical Republicans.
Pressure and Political Maneuvering Behind the Vote
Gabbard’s nomination wasn’t just debated behind closed doors—it was fought over in public. In the days leading up to the vote, Republican leaders, including Vice President Vance, reportedly worked the phones to ensure her confirmation would move forward. Even Elon Musk, never one to stay out of politics, played a role in an online pressure campaign to back her nomination.
Todd Young, initially hesitant, laid out key conditions before throwing his support behind her. He wanted reassurances that Gabbard would report foreign travel details to the Senate Intelligence Committee and work closely with lawmakers on surveillance programs. When she agreed, Young’s support was locked in.
What’s Next in the Senate?
With the committee vote behind her, Gabbard’s nomination will now go before the full Senate. Given the tight margins, she can afford to lose up to three Republican votes and still be confirmed, as Vice President Vance holds the tie-breaking vote.
Expect plenty of debate before the final decision is made. Some senators remain unconvinced she’s the right choice, while others see her as exactly the kind of independent thinker needed in the role.
Our Take
Gabbard’s nomination highlights a troubling shift in how intelligence leadership is selected. The DNI is supposed to be a nonpartisan position, yet her confirmation has turned into just another partisan battle. Worse, her track record of questioning U.S. intelligence assessments and engaging with foreign adversaries raises serious concerns.
Handing over the nation’s intelligence apparatus to someone with a history of bucking traditional security norms could weaken the country’s strategic edge. Political outsiders can bring fresh perspectives, but when it comes to national security, experience and alignment with U.S. interests should take precedence.
Tulsi Gabbard’s potential confirmation may excite those who want disruption in Washington, but at what cost? If she brings the same unpredictability to intelligence that she has to politics, the American people could pay the price.
