Written by Jonathan Pierce.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is actively exploring federal measures to prevent China from acquiring American farmland. USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins emphasized that keeping American farmland under U.S. ownership is a priority, given the risks associated with foreign entities—especially those tied to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Rollins pointed out that former President Donald Trump played a crucial role in shifting the global perspective on China’s growing influence. Back in 2016, few policymakers viewed China as a serious threat to national security, let alone to food security. However, Trump’s policies and public stance forced the issue into mainstream debate. Now, with his administration back in power, tackling China’s land purchases is a key focus.
The Push for State-Level Bans
While several states have taken their own steps to block Chinese entities from purchasing farmland, there is still no federal law stopping such acquisitions. Some states, including South Dakota and Florida, have outright banned the practice. Others are still debating legislation that would restrict foreign ownership of farmland. As of mid-last year, over two-thirds of states had already implemented or were considering some form of action.
Rollins, who previously led the America First Policy Institute before taking the role of USDA Secretary, has been a strong advocate for state-level restrictions. She sees the states as “laboratories of democracy” and believes they should have a say in how land ownership is handled. However, she also recognizes that state-level action alone may not be enough. That’s why the federal government is now seriously considering national measures to curb China’s land purchases.
Military and National Security Implications
One of the biggest concerns about Chinese entities purchasing American farmland is the proximity of some of these properties to military bases and other critical infrastructure. Rollins noted that large tracts of land have been purchased near key U.S. military outposts, raising serious security red flags.
From a national security standpoint, allowing a foreign adversary to gain access to farmland near sensitive locations is a major risk. It’s not just about food security—it’s about keeping potential threats at a safe distance from critical defense operations. The Trump administration is weighing a variety of options, including direct federal intervention, to prevent further acquisitions.
Our Take
The idea that China has been allowed to buy up American farmland in the first place is outrageous. This isn’t just a trade issue—it’s a direct national security concern. The fact that some of these properties are located near military bases only makes it worse. While state-level bans are a step in the right direction, they aren’t enough to stop this problem entirely. There needs to be a strong federal response to make sure foreign adversaries can’t gain a foothold in America’s agricultural sector.
The pushback against China’s influence in agriculture should have happened long ago. The Trump administration’s renewed focus on this issue is long overdue, but it’s necessary. If China controls even a fraction of America’s food supply, it gives them leverage over the country in ways that go beyond simple economics. Food security is national security, and failing to act on this issue would be a huge mistake.
