Written by Bethany Harper.

House Speaker Mike Johnson’s proposed legislation concerning the FISA Amendments Act poses a significant risk to our constitutional rights.

The State of FISA

The discussions in the House and Senate regarding Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act are critical, especially for those concerned about privacy rights. Section 702 allows for warrantless surveillance, a practice that has raised serious constitutional questions.

A Questionable Proposal

The proposed HR 6611, also known as the “HPSCI bill,” is troubling. It not only reauthorizes Section 702 for an extended period but also broadens the definition of “foreign intelligence,” potentially expanding surveillance capabilities.

A Glimmer of Hope?

While the House Judiciary Committee’s proposal offers some improvements, it still falls short. Reauthorizing Section 702 without warrant requirements is a step backward in protecting privacy rights.

The Need for Real Reform

The compromise bill put forward by Johnson is disappointing. It lacks essential reforms and fails to address the concerns of those worried about government overreach. The current proposals threaten our Fourth Amendment rights by allowing unchecked surveillance without probable cause or suspicion. The debate over the third-party doctrine underscores the need for reform. The Supreme Court’s interpretation has allowed for widespread surveillance without proper oversight. It’s time to reevaluate the legality of warrantless surveillance programs. Our rights should not be compromised in the name of national security.

Our Take

The proposed FISA ‘reform’ bills fall short of protecting our constitutional rights. We urge lawmakers to prioritize privacy and uphold the principles of the Fourth Amendment.