Written by Daniel Thompson.

In a move that has ignited considerable debate, House Democrats voted unanimously on Wednesday to grant illegal aliens, including those referred to by some as “Joe Biden’s 11 million illegal border crossers,” potential representation in Congress and the Electoral College. This historic decision could reshape the political landscape by altering how congressional seats and Electoral College votes are distributed, prioritizing areas with higher populations of undocumented residents.

The vote, which ended with a narrow margin of 206 to 202, saw an even split among abstentions, with 11 Democrats and 11 Republicans choosing not to participate. This development has stirred significant controversy, as it directly impacts the foundational elements of American democratic representation. Critics argue that this move prioritizes non-citizens over American citizens, particularly in terms of political representation and resource allocation.

Steven Miller, a vocal commentator on such issues, articulated the frustration felt by many, stating, “House Dems just voted UNANIMOUSLY to give illegals representation in Congress AND the Electoral College. House Seats and Electoral College votes WILL BE added to areas with the most illegals (including all Biden illegals) unless Senate passes the bill. Invasion by design.” This statement encapsulates the concerns of those who feel that the decision undermines the principles of American democracy.

The Contentious H.R.7109

The core of this debate centers around H.R.7109, a bill that not only requires a citizenship question on the decennial census but also proposes that apportionment of Representatives be based on the number of United States citizens rather than on total population counts. This legislative change aims to redefine who is counted in determining the distribution of political power throughout the country.

Opponents of the bill argue that including non-citizens in population counts for apportionment dilutes the political influence of American citizens, particularly in areas with lower populations of illegal aliens. Proponents, however, argue that all residents, regardless of citizenship status, contribute to their communities and should therefore be represented.

The bill’s future in the Senate remains uncertain, as Democrats there have indicated they will not bring it to a vote. This standoff reflects the broader national conflict over immigration policy and its intersection with electoral politics, highlighting deep divisions on how best to manage and integrate the nation’s diverse population.

Implications for American Democracy

The decision by House Democrats to push forward with granting representation to illegal aliens has sparked a broader discussion about the nature of representation and citizenship in America. It raises critical questions about the balance between inclusive governance and the rights of citizenship. With the Senate’s reluctance to take up the bill, the issue is poised to remain a significant point of contention in American politics.

As debates continue, the implications of these changes on local and national elections could be profound. Adjusting congressional and Electoral College representation based on populations that include illegal aliens could shift political power significantly, particularly in states with large immigrant populations. This shift is viewed by some as a strategic move to influence future electoral outcomes, while others see it as a necessary step toward more equitable representation.

Our Take

The unanimous decision by House Democrats to potentially grant Congressional and Electoral College representation to illegal aliens is a drastic departure from traditional American values concerning citizenship and democratic participation. Such a move could undermine the very fabric of our electoral system, prioritizing non-citizens over American voters in the political process. This decision, if not checked, could lead to a fundamental transformation of American political dynamics, one that might permanently alter the landscape of electoral fairness and citizen representation in our democracy.