Written by Michael Harris.

In a stunning revelation, renowned vaccinologist Dr. Stanley Plotkin has admitted that mRNA vaccines are not as safe as previously claimed. After years of staunchly promoting these experimental vaccines, Plotkin’s recent paper published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on July 6, 2024, has laid bare the lack of rigorous safety studies both before and after the release of these vaccines.

Aaron Siri, a vocal critic of vaccine safety protocols, tweeted extensively about Plotkin’s new paper. According to Siri, the paper acknowledges that “prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes and follow-up durations,” and that “there are no resources earmarked for postauthorization safety studies.” Siri described this as an “incredible reversal” and accused the vaccine industry and Big Pharma of engaging in scientific fraud.

For years, the medical community has insisted that vaccines are among the most thoroughly studied medical products. Dr. Paul Offit, for instance, famously stated, “I think we should be proud of vaccines as arguably the safest, best tested things we put in our body.” However, parents of vaccine-injured children and other concerned individuals have long contested these claims, often facing harsh criticism from health agencies and medical professionals.

The Turning Point

The narrative began to shift in 2018 when Siri met with Plotkin to discuss the flaws in the nation’s vaccination program. During their meeting, Siri presented undeniable evidence of the lack of comprehensive vaccine safety trials. Initially, Plotkin denied these claims, but he now admits their validity.

At the time, Plotkin reacted vehemently to Siri’s evidence, urging the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to include “missing information on safety and efficacy” in vaccine package inserts. He also pushed for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to exclude harm lists from Vaccine Information Sheets. Plotkin’s efforts extended to lobbying the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Health Organization (WHO), and various medical associations to promote the idea of vaccine safety, despite the absence of thorough studies.

Plotkin’s crusade to validate vaccine safety through nonexistent studies was relentless. However, as the world begins to scrutinize the COVID-19 vaccines developed under Operation Warp Speed, Plotkin’s stance has dramatically shifted. Now, he acknowledges the fundamental issue: the absence of proper safety studies means there is no reliable safety data to include in FDA package inserts, and concealing harms from CDC inserts does not eliminate the risks.

Acknowledging the Fraud

Siri’s commentary on Plotkin’s revelations is damning. He argues that for decades, Plotkin and his peers have deceived the public by claiming that vaccines are the most thoroughly safety-tested products. According to Siri, this fraudulent assurance has been used to deflect legitimate concerns and criticisms.

“Parents and other adults don’t simply stop believing what they have seen with their own eyes because CDC, WHO, the Gates Foundation, etc., won’t acknowledge them, or worse, they attack them,” Siri stated. He believes that Plotkin and his followers are now attempting to co-opt the truth they have long denied, acknowledging their failure to cast a “voodoo” spell over the public regarding vaccine safety.

Siri concludes by emphasizing that Plotkin and his “disciples” have lied, gaslit, and defrauded the public for years. They falsely claimed that vaccines are probably the most thoroughly tested products, leaving no stone unturned in ensuring their safety. This admission is a significant step towards holding the vaccine industry accountable for its decades-long deception.

Our Take

The revelations from Dr. Stanley Plotkin are deeply troubling and highlight the need for transparency and accountability in the vaccine industry. For years, the public has been misled about the safety of vaccines, with significant consequences for public trust and health. This admission underscores the importance of rigorous, transparent safety studies and the dangers of placing blind trust in institutions that have shown a willingness to deceive.

It’s crucial that we demand better from our health agencies and the pharmaceutical industry. The public deserves to know the truth about the products being promoted and administered, especially when it concerns our health and well-being. The deception uncovered by Plotkin’s admission is a stark reminder of the need for vigilance and skepticism in the face of corporate and institutional assurances.