Written by Matthew Collins.
In a revelation that could shake the foundations of democracy, Alex Soros, along with the Open Society Foundation, is said to have secret access to 23,000 electronic voting machines across the United States. This astonishing claim comes from a hacker who was alarmed by how effortlessly the machines could be compromised, allowing for vote manipulation. The hacker expressed disbelief, stating that the machines, poised for use in the upcoming presidential election, are so riddled with flaws that they seem more like deliberate design choices than accidental weaknesses. All these issues allegedly trace back to the Soros family and their admitted involvement in U.S. elections.
Despite ongoing denials by Democrats and the mainstream media, who assert that voter fraud is a myth, curious voting patterns continue to emerge in key races, consistently favoring the Democrats. Over the past few years, anyone questioning the integrity of the election process has been dismissed as an “election denier” or a “conspiracy theorist.” However, with the latest revelations, it seems these so-called conspiracy theorists might have had a point all along. The hacker’s discoveries suggest that the nation’s voting machines are far from secure—almost as vulnerable as leaving your house keys under the doormat.
Election Tampering and Media Admission
The reality, as some see it, is that electronic voting machines have become one of the many tools Democrats allegedly use to manipulate election outcomes. A glaring example of this was the 2020 election, where such machines reportedly played a pivotal role in swinging the vote in favor of Joe Biden. The situation has grown so blatant that even mainstream media outlets, long accused of ignoring such issues, have started to acknowledge the problem.
Politico recently published an article highlighting the vulnerabilities in voting systems, noting that hackers identified flaws in everything from voting machines to e-poll books. The article, titled “The nation’s best hackers found vulnerabilities in voting machines — but no time to fix them,” quotes hackers expressing deep concern over the security gaps, particularly in an election year. They emphasized that the vulnerabilities are so serious that fixing them before the next election would be impossible. One organizer of a DEF CON hacking event, Catherine Terranova, admitted that addressing the flaws isn’t a quick fix, comparing it to Microsoft’s routine patching process.
The hacker who revealed the flaws described the vulnerabilities as so egregious that they allowed for vote manipulation without detection. With the clock ticking toward the 2024 election, the prospect of securing these machines seems dim. Perhaps it’s time to reconsider electronic voting altogether and revert to paper ballots. After all, countries like the U.K. and India manage to count votes by hand efficiently, while nations like Venezuela, home to Smartmatic, are infamous for their questionable election results.
Soros’ Influence and Voter Fraud
According to the hacker, Alex Soros and his fiancée, Huma Abedin, are acutely aware that the upcoming November election is crucial for their survival—both politically and personally. They are reportedly willing to go to any lengths to ensure the votes keep flipping in favor of the Democrats. Hillary Clinton’s previous endorsement of George Soros, praising his interest in U.S. elections, is a testament to the deep ties between the Soros family and the Democratic Party. While some might view this as a benign interest in democracy, others see it as a calculated effort to control election outcomes.
Hillary Clinton’s history of justifying election tampering further fuels these suspicions. In a 2006 audio recording, she is heard telling a newspaper editor that the U.S. should have influenced the outcome of a foreign election. Such revelations, along with the involvement of figures like Obama, who some accuse of being complicit in election tampering, have only heightened concerns about the integrity of the democratic process.
The arrogance of the global elite, as some critics argue, is becoming their downfall. More and more people are waking up to their agenda, including influential voices like Elon Musk, who has publicly called for a ban on electronic voting machines in the U.S. Musk warned that these machines are designed to enable widespread fraud by bad actors, echoing concerns raised by others about the vulnerabilities in the system.
Puerto Rico’s recent primary elections, plagued by discrepancies in vote totals linked to Dominion Voting Systems, have reignited debates about the reliability of electronic voting. The problems in Puerto Rico are reminiscent of the well-known incident in Antrim County, where a Dominion machine mistakenly counted thousands of extra votes for Biden instead of Trump. This recurring pattern of votes flipping to Democrats raises a critical question: Why does it always seem to benefit one party?
Our Take
The revelations about the vulnerabilities in electronic voting machines are deeply troubling for anyone who values the integrity of the democratic process. When powerful figures like the Soros family allegedly have the means to manipulate election outcomes, it undermines the very foundation of our republic. The mainstream media’s slow acknowledgment of these issues only adds to the suspicion that there is a concerted effort to keep the truth from the public. The repeated discrepancies in vote totals, particularly those favoring Democrats, suggest that there may be more to the story than just technical glitches.
It’s time for a serious conversation about the future of voting in America. If electronic voting machines are indeed as compromised as these reports suggest, then reverting to paper ballots might be the only way to restore trust in our elections. The stakes are too high to ignore these concerns, and the American people deserve a voting system that is both transparent and secure.
