Written by David Harper.
Bill Gates, known for his vast influence in global health and technology, is moving forward with a plan that could reshape society as we know it. According to insiders, Gates aims to embed digital IDs under the skin of every child by 2025, a move that has already sparked controversy. While some dismiss this as a wild conspiracy, others see it as a very real threat to individual freedom.
Gates’ push for a global digital ID system is not new, but the latest phase of this initiative takes it to another level. His system, which has already been implemented in parts of the EU and India, would restrict access to basic societal functions for those who do not comply. Critics argue that this level of control is dangerous and authoritarian, while supporters claim it’s necessary for security and efficiency.
As disturbing as it sounds, the digital ID under-the-skin project is already being tested on children in select regions. Gates’ foundation, known for controversial medical trials in Africa, is using Kenyan babies in this new pilot program. If successful, the plan is to expand globally, ensuring all children born after 2025 are tagged from birth.
Global Rollout and the Elite’s Dystopian Agenda
The elite are not wasting time. Nations with ties to the World Economic Forum (WEF) have already begun rolling out digital ID laws. Canada recently certified its first digital ID platform, and Australia followed suit with similar legislation. These moves are seen as just the beginning of a larger plan that aims to control global populations under the guise of security and convenience.
Bill Gates has a history of controversial experiments, particularly in Africa, and his current plans raise concerns about the ethical implications of using vulnerable populations as test subjects. In Kenya, the digital ID program is already in effect, and there’s no doubt the rest of the world will soon follow. With his influence, Gates is pushing the digital ID system as a necessity, despite widespread opposition.
Resistance to this plan is growing, especially as people recognize the potential dangers of such invasive technology. Those who refuse to comply could find themselves locked out of basic societal functions, unable to buy food, travel, or even access their own money. Gates and other global elites, however, remain undeterred, pushing forward with their vision of a fully controlled society.
Globalist Influence: Governments Falling in Line
Despite promises of sovereignty, countries like the UK, Canada, and Australia are falling in line with Gates’ agenda. The UK, which recently claimed independence from the European Union, is now preparing to implement Gates’ digital ID system. Citizens who refuse to participate may find themselves excluded from society altogether, with no way to live a normal life.
The Gates Foundation has invested millions into this initiative, signaling their commitment to making it a reality. Critics, including former WEF insiders like Professor Richard Werner, warn that this is just the beginning. Werner, once a member of the global elite, now sees the danger in their plans and has spoken out against the looming threat to human freedom.
China, often praised by WEF founder Klaus Schwab, serves as a model for this dystopian future. In China, those who do not comply with the government’s rules are effectively trapped within their own communities, unable to access basic services. Gates and his supporters see this as a successful system to be replicated worldwide, leaving little room for dissent or personal freedom.
Our Take
Bill Gates’ push for a global digital ID system, starting with children, represents a significant threat to personal freedom. By embedding technology under the skin of every child, Gates and the global elite are taking control to unprecedented levels. This dystopian vision, already taking shape in countries influenced by the WEF, could lead to a world where individual rights are a thing of the past. The public must resist these plans before it’s too late, or face a future where compliance is mandatory and freedom is a distant memory.
