Written by James Whitaker.
The Trump administration is poised to shake up immigration policy, proposing a strategy to deport undocumented migrants even if their home countries refuse to accept them. Reports suggest that Trump’s team might send these individuals to countries like Turks and Caicos, the Bahamas, or Panama—raising eyebrows and plenty of questions.
This bold initiative underscores Trump’s commitment to fulfilling his promise of executing the largest deportation program in U.S. history. The transition team has kept specifics under wraps, leaving Americans to wonder whether the deported individuals would be allowed to work in these new locations or how these nations might be persuaded to cooperate.
Federal immigration authorities have long struggled with countries that refuse to repatriate deportees. Historically, such individuals often remain in the U.S., even after immigration judges order their removal. During President Biden’s term, the challenges grew as a surge of illegal immigrants overwhelmed the system, with countries like Venezuela refusing deportation flights altogether.
Venezuela and the Negotiation Dilemma
Venezuela stands as a stark example of the complex geopolitical web surrounding deportation policies. Under President Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela ceased accepting deportation flights, despite being a significant source of illegal immigration to the U.S. This left American authorities scrambling for solutions while Venezuelans fled economic collapse, political repression, and skyrocketing inflation in their homeland.
Reports indicate that Maduro’s regime is pressuring Trump to ease U.S. sanctions in exchange for resuming deportation flights. The question remains: Will Trump play ball? Given his track record of tough negotiations, it seems unlikely he’ll budge without extracting substantial concessions.
Other nations, including China and Cuba, have also resisted deportation efforts in the past. However, both have recently resumed accepting flights from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), signaling a potential shift in cooperation under the right circumstances.
The Border Crisis and Reversing Policies
During his first presidency, Trump enacted deals with Central American nations like Guatemala and Honduras, requiring asylum seekers to apply for refuge there before reaching the U.S. These agreements, alongside policies like the “Remain in Mexico” program, were aimed at reducing the flow of migrants. But Biden swiftly suspended these measures upon taking office, a move many critics argue exacerbated the current border crisis.
Trump’s comeback agenda includes reinstating those agreements, resuming border wall construction, and even ending birthright citizenship—though the latter faces significant constitutional hurdles. His administration also secured a recent legal win when a federal appeals court allowed ICE to use Seattle’s Boeing Field for deportation flights, overturning a 2019 local executive order.
This court decision reaffirms federal sovereignty over immigration enforcement, a slap in the face to sanctuary cities and states that have tried to block deportation efforts.
Our Take
