Written by Matthew Harper.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has never been shy about voicing his suspicions surrounding the 1963 assassination of his uncle, President John F. Kennedy. Now, according to reports from Axios, he’s taking those suspicions to the next level. RFK Jr. is lobbying for his daughter-in-law, Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, to be nominated as the CIA’s deputy director. His reasoning? He believes her position could help uncover the truth about whether the CIA played a role in JFK’s death.
It’s a story with all the elements of a political thriller—family legacy, shadowy government agencies, and decades-old mysteries. But for RFK Jr., it’s more than just a story. It’s a cause he’s willing to pursue in the highest halls of power.
The Connection Between Amaryllis Fox and RFK Jr.’s Mission
Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, a former undercover CIA agent with nearly a decade of service, is no stranger to intrigue. Her experience gives RFK Jr. confidence that she’s uniquely positioned to dig into the classified files and buried secrets that have long surrounded JFK’s assassination.
After running RFK Jr.’s independent presidential campaign, Fox Kennedy demonstrated political savvy and a talent for navigating high-stakes situations. While RFK Jr. didn’t secure the presidency, his endorsement of Republican Donald Trump paved the way for her potential nomination. Trump, who has already expressed interest in declassifying the remaining JFK assassination documents, might see Fox Kennedy as an ally in exposing the truth.
This alliance between Trump and RFK Jr., a former Democrat, is unconventional but strategic. Trump has tapped RFK Jr. for a prominent role in his administration, nominating him to head the Department of Health and Human Services. Meanwhile, former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe has been selected to lead the CIA. Together, they represent a political realignment with serious implications for the future of the intelligence community.
Theories, Claims, and the CIA Connection
RFK Jr. has long argued that the official narrative of JFK’s assassination doesn’t hold water. According to the Warren Commission, Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone when he shot the president in Dallas on November 22, 1963. But RFK Jr. believes that narrative was a smokescreen, hiding the CIA’s involvement.
In an interview with Tucker Carlson, RFK Jr. laid out his theory, claiming the CIA had both motive and opportunity. He pointed to the strained relationship between JFK and the agency, particularly after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion and the Cuban Missile Crisis. JFK had fired CIA director Allen Dulles in 1961, and RFK Jr. contends that Dulles harbored a grudge.
Dulles, who later served on the Warren Commission, allegedly played a key role in steering the investigation away from the CIA. RFK Jr. has also linked his father’s 1968 assassination to the agency, suggesting a pattern of political retaliation against the Kennedy family.
These claims remain unproven, but RFK Jr. is determined to follow the trail wherever it leads. With Trump’s support and Fox Kennedy’s potential role at the CIA, he believes he might finally have the tools to uncover the truth.
Why the Truth Matters
For RFK Jr., this isn’t just about vindicating his family’s legacy—it’s about accountability. If the CIA was involved in JFK’s assassination, what does that say about the integrity of American democracy? And what other secrets might still be hidden in classified files?
While some dismiss RFK Jr.’s claims as conspiracy theories, others see them as a challenge to the deep state, a term often used to describe entrenched government institutions operating outside public oversight. In an era of increasing skepticism toward powerful agencies, the push to declassify JFK-related documents resonates with many Americans.
Our Take
From a conservative perspective, RFK Jr.’s pursuit of the truth about JFK’s assassination is both commendable and concerning. On one hand, it’s important to hold government agencies accountable and ensure transparency. The American people deserve to know the truth about events that shaped their history.
However, the way this is unfolding raises red flags. Pushing to place a family member in a high-ranking CIA position could create conflicts of interest and undermine public trust. The optics alone—lobbying for a relative to investigate a personal cause—might erode credibility, even if the intentions are genuine.
Additionally, revisiting the JFK assassination risks reigniting old tensions without offering concrete solutions to today’s challenges. America faces pressing issues, from economic instability to border security. While it’s essential to seek the truth, it’s just as crucial to prioritize the nation’s current needs.
RFK Jr.’s efforts might shine a light on a dark chapter of history, but they could also deepen public cynicism about the government’s ability to serve its people.
