Written by Christian Miller.
The recent wave of accusations against the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has sparked significant controversy. The agency was taken over by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), leading to its sudden closure by President Donald Trump. This move came after allegations of the agency’s involvement in manipulating foreign elections, notably in Brazil’s 2022 election where it allegedly favored socialist candidate Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva over the incumbent Jair Bolsonaro.
Whistleblower Revelations
A State Department whistleblower named Mike Benz went public with these claims on Steve Bannon’s WarRoom, suggesting that USAID’s actions mirrored interference tactics seen in the 2020 U.S. election. Benz’s narrative didn’t stop there; in an interview with Tucker Carlson, he further accused USAID of meddling in global politics for regime change, a practice that he claimed was now affecting domestic U.S. Politics.
Impeachment Connections
Investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger brought to light how USAID’s funds were linked to the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), which played a role in the 2019 impeachment of Donald Trump. Shellenberger pointed out that OCCRP, under USAID’s influence, wasn’t just reporting but actively shaping political outcomes, an activity that could be seen as interference in American elections.
Legal Implications
With Attorney General Pam Bondi stepping in, these allegations could lead to significant legal repercussions. While the Constitution does allow for severe penalties for treason, it’s uncertain whether Bondi will push for the death penalty. However, the focus isn’t just on those who directly managed these operations but also on political figures like Adam Schiff, whose involvement in related political maneuvers might come under scrutiny.
Financial Trails and Political Elites
Further investigation by various Twitter (now X) users has revealed a financial pathway from USAID through the State Department, which was once led by Hillary Clinton, to the Clinton Foundation. This pathway involves the Tides Foundation, a nonprofit linked to George Soros, illustrating a complex network of money laundering. This network not only funnels public funds into private hands but also circulates money back into political campaigns and causes, predominantly those aligned with left-wing ideologies.
The End of USAID?
The closure of USAID, with its substantial budget, could disrupt this financial cycle. It forces those on the left to fund their political battles without the cover of government money. With Elon Musk’s resources and influence, the playing field might be evening out, although one could argue that the battle has only moved to a different arena.
The Iceberg Theory
Many on social media platforms like X suggest that what’s been uncovered is just the beginning. The connections between political figures, government agencies, and non-profits suggest a deeper, more intricate web of influence that could redefine how political funding works in America.
Our Take
The revelations about USAID’s involvement in domestic and international political manipulation are alarming. These actions not only undermine the democratic process but also represent a significant misuse of taxpayer money. The public has a right to transparency and integrity in how government agencies operate. The potential legal and political fallout from these discoveries could restore some trust in government operations, but only if those responsible are held accountable. The misuse of agencies like USAID for political gain is a clear betrayal of public trust and needs to be addressed to prevent further erosion of democratic principles.
