Written by John Matthews.
Within the vast machinery of America’s intelligence community, tasked with safeguarding national interests, a startling distraction has emerged. Internal documents recently acquired reveal that some National Security Agency employees have been engaging in extensive, sexually explicit conversations during work hours. These revelations, sourced from a current and a former NSA insider via the agency’s Intelink messaging system, expose discussions ranging from transgender surgeries to polyamorous relationships—activities that starkly contrast with the NSA’s stated mission.
Explicit Exchanges on Intelink
The chat logs, spanning two years, paint a vivid picture of unprofessional conduct. Employees openly discussed intimate details of gender reassignment procedures, including one claiming his surgery enabled him to “wear leggings or bikinis without having to wear a gaff under it.” Others described the sensations of post-castration intimacy or the logistics of laser hair removal, with one noting the “shocking” experience of having his “butthole zapped by a laser.” Another boasted about aiding colleagues with estrogen treatments, stating, “I just enjoy helping other people experience boobs.” These exchanges occurred on Intelink, a platform meant for mission-related communication, despite an NSA official confirming that such non-work content violates usage policies and invites discipline.
Beyond surgical topics, the conversations veered into alternative lifestyles. One employee outlined a “polycule”—a network of polyamorous partners—explaining, “A is my girlfriend, and B-G are her partners,” with additional “metas-with-benefits” connections. Another claimed membership in a nine-person polycule, casually likening it to a chemical compound. A current NSA source reported witnessing hundreds of provocative threads, including a particularly unsettling discussion about weekend “gangbangs,” which left a former employee “disgusted.” For an average American—perhaps a parent in Virginia or a retiree in Ohio—these glimpses into taxpayer-funded time raise immediate questions about focus and accountability.
DEI as a Cover for Distraction
How did this behavior gain traction? According to insiders, the NSA’s embrace of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives provided a shield. LGBTQ+ employee resource groups, endorsed by agency leadership as “mission imperative,” became hubs for these discussions. Meetings titled “Privilege,” “Ally Awareness,” and “Transgender Community Inclusion” consumed workdays, with activists recruiting and legitimizing personal preoccupations as official duties. One staffer even demanded “it/its” pronouns, arguing that “dehumanizing” was a “positive effect” for them—dismissing dissent as erasure. “These are folks with top secret clearances believing they are an IT!” the current NSA source remarked, incredulous.
This isn’t a fringe issue. The intelligence community employs tens of thousands, and these logs suggest hundreds are involved. Under past administrations, DEI grew entrenched—training sessions ballooned, and affinity groups multiplied. Yet the mission—countering cyber threats, tracking terror networks—demands razor-sharp focus. When a data analyst in Maryland or a veteran in Texas hears their tax dollars fund chats about castration or polycules, frustration is justifiable. The NSA insists violations face consequences, but the scale hints at lax enforcement—until now, perhaps.
Our Take
These revelations expose a troubling lapse in professionalism at the NSA. Staff with access to America’s most sensitive secrets prioritizing sex chats over duty isn’t just a distraction—it’s a liability. The Trump administration’s incoming leaders—President Donald Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and DNI Tulsi Gabbard—have a point: “woke” priorities have seeped in, and this is the fallout. DEI’s cover for such behavior must end; it’s hard to see how polyamory seminars thwart foreign espionage. The insiders’ leaks prove the rot’s real, and the public deserves better.
That said, dismantling this won’t be simple. These activists—hundreds strong, ideologically dug in—won’t go quietly. Pronoun debates and kink talks signal deeper psychological quirks unfit for high-stakes roles. Trump’s team can’t just tweak policy; they need to purge the ranks. Anything less risks leaving a distracted agency hobbling along. With legal pushback looming and staff already griping about cabinet picks, the fight’s just starting—national security hangs in the balance.
