Supposedly, the following link leads to the latest version of the Epstein files (https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein). The 22 documents at the aforementioned link are PDFs. I have run all of them through AI to extract all the names and potential crimes associated with these names. This is what Grok 3 spit out:

List of Names and Potential Crimes

1. Jeffrey Epstein
   • Potential Crime(s):
     • Child Prostitution: Explicitly mentioned in FBI documents under the title “JEFFREY EPSTEIN; WSTA – CHILD PROSTITUTION” (e.g., Pages 7, 36, 40). This suggests an investigation into activities involving the exploitation of minors for sexual purposes.
     • Felony Solicitation of Minors: Page 35 (news clipping from the Palm Beach Post, dated 07/30/2006) states that Epstein was charged with “one count of felony solicitation of possible man [minors],” carrying a maximum penalty of five years in prison.
     • Soliciting a Prostitute: Page 12 (news article by Nicole Janok) reports Epstein was “charged with soliciting a prostitute” and was jailed on this charge, released on a $3,000 bond.
   • Context: The Palm Beach Police Department conducted an investigation from March 2005 to February 2006 into Epstein’s activities, alleging he paid underage girls and young women for massages and sometimes sex (Pages 9, 35). His attorney, Jack Goldberger, contested these allegations, claiming Epstein committed no crimes and that the accusers were not credible (Page 12).
2. Jack Goldberger
   • Potential Crime(s): None identified.
   • Context: Identified as Jeffrey Epstein’s attorney in the news article on Page 12. Goldberger defended Epstein, asserting that Epstein did not commit crimes, passed a lie detector test denying knowledge of the girls’ minor status, and that the accusers had histories of drug abuse and theft, labeling them as unreliable. There is no indication in the document that Goldberger committed any crime; he is mentioned solely in his professional capacity as a defense attorney.
3. Alfredo Rodriguez
   • Potential Crime(s): None explicitly identified.
   • Context: Mentioned on Page 10 as a former houseman employed by Jeffrey Epstein from November 2004 to May 2005. Rodriguez provided a sworn statement to the Palm Beach Police Department on January 4, 2006, detailing his role (butler, chauffeur, chef, houseman) and his observations at Epstein’s residence. The specific content of his statement is redacted, so no direct crime is attributed to him. He appears as a witness rather than a suspect.
4. Michael Reiter
   • Potential Crime(s): None identified.
   • Context: Identified as the Palm Beach Police Chief in the news article on Page 12. Reiter wrote a letter to State Attorney Barry Krischer on May 1, 2006, suggesting Krischer consider disqualification from prosecuting Epstein’s case, indicating dissatisfaction with the handling of the investigation. Reiter is not implicated in any criminal activity; he is a law enforcement official involved in the case.
5. Barry Krischer
   • Potential Crime(s): None identified.
   • Context: Mentioned as the State Attorney in the news article on Page 12. Krischer referred Epstein’s case to a grand jury rather than filing charges directly, a decision criticized by Epstein’s attorney as an attempt to appease Chief Reiter. There is no evidence in the document suggesting Krischer committed a crime; he is referenced in his official prosecutorial role.
6. Laura Johnson
   • Potential Crime(s): None identified.
   • Context: Named as a Circuit Court Judge on Page 44, who signed an order on October 19, 2005, sealing a search warrant, affidavit, and related documents in the Epstein investigation pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 119.07(3)(b). Johnson is not implicated in any crime; she is a judicial official involved in the legal process.
7. Nicole Janok
   • Potential Crime(s): None identified.
   • Context: Identified as the author of the news article “Mystery money man faces soliciting charge” on Page 12, published in the Palm Beach Post. Janok is a journalist reporting on the Epstein case and is not associated with any criminal activity.

• Alan Dershowitz (misspelled as Hershowitz in text)

• Potential Crime(s): None identified.
• Context: Mentioned as Epstein’s attorney in the news article (Page 11), a Harvard law professor who provided the State Attorney’s office with information about the girls’ alcohol and marijuana use to challenge their credibility. He is part of Epstein’s defense team, not implicated in criminal activity.

• Jack Goldberger

• Potential Crime(s): None identified.
• Context: Named as Epstein’s attorney in the news article (Page 11), who did not return phone messages. He is part of the defense team denying Epstein’s involvement with underage girls, with no indication of criminal acts.

• Brad Edwards

• Potential Crime(s): None identified.
• Context: Attorney representing Jane Doe No. 1 and No. 2 in a federal case (Page 101), arguing that the U.S. Attorney’s non-prosecution agreement with Epstein violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. Edwards is a legal advocate for victims, not a suspect.

• Paul Cassell

• Potential Crime(s): None identified.
• Context: Co-counsel with Edwards for Jane Doe No. 1 and No. 2 (Page 101), challenging the non-prosecution agreement’s legality. A Fort Lauderdale lawyer, he argued against the narrow interpretation of victim rights (Page 102), not implicated in crimes.

• Kenneth Marra

• Potential Crime(s): None identified.
• Context: U.S. District Judge presiding over the victims’ rights case (Page 101), set to rule on whether the non-prosecution agreement violated Jane Doe No. 1 and No. 2’s rights. He questioned the U.S. Attorney’s actions (Page 102) but is a judicial official, not a suspect.

• Dexter Lee

• Potential Crime(s): None identified.
• Context: Assistant U.S. Attorney defending the non-prosecution agreement (Page 102), arguing that victim notification rights apply only post-indictment. He represents the government’s position, not accused of crimes.

• Roy Black

• Potential Crime(s): None identified.
• Context: Criminal defense attorney for Epstein (Page 102), arguing that plea deal correspondence is protected by attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. Given two weeks by Judge Marra to justify sealing the documents, Black is a legal representative, not a suspect.

• Judy Orihuela

• Potential Crime(s): None identified.
• Context: FBI spokeswoman quoted on March 21, 2007 (Page 11), stating, “We still have a pending case,” confirming the ongoing investigation into Epstein. She is an official spokesperson, not involved in criminal activity.

• Marc Shiner

• Potential Crime(s): None identified.
• Context: Former prosecutor turned defense attorney (Page 11), commenting on legal tactics like delaying discovery to secure plea deals. He suggests Epstein might receive pretrial intervention, but is not implicated in the case itself.

• David Rogers

• Potential Crime(s): None identified.
• Context: Daily News staff writer authoring the article on Pages 101-102, reporting on the August 12, 2011, court hearing. He is a journalist, not involved in the crimes.

• Prince Andrew (implied, not explicitly investigated here)

• Potential Crime(s): None explicitly identified in this document.
• Context: Mentioned in a Daily Mail headline (Page 99) linking him to a 17-year-old girl Epstein allegedly flew to Britain. The article suggests association, but no crime is directly attributed to him in this FBI file, and he is not a subject of the investigation documented here.

Antonia J. Barnes

• Potential Crime(s): None identified.
• Context